PANEL - Word Related Documents




#
Rank
Similarity
Title + Abs.
Year
PMID
012345
147700.9963Multicenter Evaluation of the BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel for Detection of Bacteria, Yeasts, and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Positive Blood Culture Samples. Diagnostic tools that can rapidly identify and characterize microbes growing in blood cultures are important components of clinical microbiology practice because they help to provide timely information that can be used to optimize patient management. This publication describes the bioMérieux BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) Panel clinical study that was submitted to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Results obtained with the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel were compared to standard-of-care (SoC) results, sequencing results, PCR results, and reference laboratory antimicrobial susceptibility testing results to evaluate the accuracy of its performance. Results for 1,093 retrospectively and prospectively collected positive blood culture samples were initially enrolled, and 1,074 samples met the study criteria and were included in the final analyses. The BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 98.9% (1,712/1,731) and an overall specificity of 99.6% (33,592/33,711) for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and yeast targets which the panel is designed to detect. One hundred eighteen off-panel organisms, which the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel is not designed to detect, were identified by SoC in 10.6% (114/1,074) of samples. The BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel also demonstrated an overall positive percent agreement (PPA) of 97.9% (325/332) and an overall negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.9% (2,465/2,767) for antimicrobial resistance determinants which the panel is designed to detect. The presence or absence of resistance markers in Enterobacterales correlated closely with phenotypic susceptibility and resistance. We conclude that the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel produced accurate results in this clinical trial.202337227281
147510.9962Evaluation of the FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Plus Panel for Rapid Diagnosis of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients. The FilmArray(®) Pneumonia plus Panel (FAPP) is a new multiplex molecular test for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), which can rapidly detect 18 bacteria, 9 viruses, and 7 resistance genes. We aimed to compare the diagnosis performance of FAPP with conventional testing in 100 intensive care unit (ICU) patients who required mechanical ventilation, with clinically suspected HAP. A total of 237 samples [76 bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL(DS)) and 82 endotracheal aspirates (ETA(DS)) obtained at HAP diagnosis, and 79 ETA obtained during follow-up (ETA(TT))], were analyzed independently by routine microbiology testing and FAPP. 58 patients had paired BAL(DS) and ETA(DS). The positivity thresholds of semi-quantified bacteria were 10(3)-10(4) CFUs/mL or 10(4) copies/mL for BAL, and 10(5) CFUs/mL or copies/mL for ETA. Respiratory commensals (H. influenzae, S. aureus, E. coli, S. pneumoniae) were the most common pathogens. Discordant results for bacterial identification were observed in 33/76 (43.4%) BAL(DS) and 36/82 (43.9%) ETA(DS), and in most cases, FAPP identified one supplemental bacteria (23/33 BAL(DS) and 21/36 ETA(DS)). An absence of growth, or polybacterial cultures, explained almost equally the majority of the non-detections in culture. No linear relationship was observed between bin and CFUs/mL variables. Concordant results between paired BAL(DS) and ETA(DS) were obtained in 46/58 (79.3%) patients with FAPP. One of the 17 resistance genes detected with FAPP (mecA/C and MREJ) was not confirmed by conventional testing. Overall, FAPP enhanced the positivity rate of diagnostic testing, with increased recognition of coinfections. Implementing this strategy may allow clinicians to make more timely and informed decisions.202032983057
147820.9961Multicenter Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel for Pathogen Detection in Bloodstream Infections. The FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel (BCID2; bioMérieux) is a fully automated PCR-based assay for identifying bacteria, fungi, and bacterial resistance markers in positive blood cultures (BC) in about 1 h. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the performance of the BCID2 panel for pathogen detection in positive BC. Conventional culture and BCID2 were performed in parallel at four tertiary-care hospitals. We included 152 positive BC-130 monomicrobial and 22 polymicrobial cultures-in this analysis. The BCID2 assay correctly identified 90% (88/98) of Gram-negative and 89% (70/79) of Gram-positive bacteria. Five bacterial isolates targeted by the BCID2 panel and recovered from five positive BC, including three polymicrobial cultures, were missed by the BCID2 assay. Fifteen isolates were off-panel organisms, accounting for 8% (15/182) of the isolates obtained from BC. The mean positive percent agreement between the BCID2 assay and standard culture was 97% (95% confidence interval, 95 to 99%), with agreement ranging from 67% for Candida albicans to 100% for 17 targets included in the BCID2 panel. BCID2 also identified the bla(CTX-M) gene in seven BC, including one for which no extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolate was obtained in culture. However, it failed to detect ESBL-encoding genes in three BC. Two of the 18 mecA/C genes detected by the BCID2 were not confirmed. No carbapenemase, mecA/C, or MREJ targets were detected. The median turnaround time was significantly shorter for BCID2 than for culture. The BCID2 panel may facilitate faster pathogen identification in bloodstream infections. IMPORTANCE Rapid molecular diagnosis combining the identification of pathogens and the detection of antibiotic resistance genes from positive blood cultures (BC) can improve the outcome for patients with bloodstream infections. The FilmArray BCID2 panel, an updated version of the original BCID, can detect 11 Gram-positive bacteria, 15 Gram-negative bacteria, 7 fungal pathogens, and 10 antimicrobial resistance genes directly from a positive BC. Here, we evaluated the real-life microbiological performance of the BCID2 assay in comparison to the results of standard methods used in routine practice at four tertiary care hospitals.202336519852
147930.9958BioFire FilmArray BCID2 versus VITEK-2 System in Determining Microbial Etiology and Antibiotic-Resistant Genes of Pathogens Recovered from Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is among the most serious hospital acquired infections. Therefore, the rapid detection of the causative microorganism is of crucial importance to allow for the appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In the present study, we analyzed the clinical performance of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel in the identification of 33 microbial species and 10 antibiotic resistance genes in comparison to the VITEK-2 system. A total of 104 blood specimens were included. The FilmArray BCID2 results were concordant with the VITEK-2 system in 69/97 specimens (71.1%). Non-concordance was either due to the detection of more pathogens by the FilmArray BCID2 23/28 (82%) or microbial species were misidentified 5/28 (18%). Hence, in comparison to the VITEK-2 system, the FilmArray BCID2 panel showed an overall sensitivity of 75.8% (95% CI, 66-83%) and an overall specificity of 98% (95% CI, 97-98.8%) in detecting microbial species. For the resistance genes, the FilmArray BCID was able to detect the presence of blaCTX-M gene in 23 Gram-negative isolates, blaNDM and blaOXA-48- like genes in 14 and 13 isolates, respectively. The mecA and mecC genes were found in 23 Staphylococcus species, while mecA, mecC and MREJ genes were found in 4 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting resistance genes by the FilmArray BCID2 was 90% (95% CI, 81.4-95%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 99-100%), respectively. As concluded, the present study emphasizes the high sensitivity and specificity of the FilmArray BCID2 in the rapid and reliable detection of different bacteria and fungi from positive blood culture bottles, as well as the accurate detection of various antibiotic resistance markers.202236358274
140240.9958Detection of β-lactam resistance genes in Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures using a microchip-based molecular assay. BACKGROUND: Accurate detection of β-lactam resistance genes in bloodstream infections is critical for guiding antimicrobial therapy. This study evaluates the Alifax Gram-negative resistance (GNR) microchip assay for detecting β-lactam resistance genes directly from positive blood cultures (PBCs) for Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, including Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. METHODS: Simulated (n=146) and clinical (n=106) GN-PBC samples were tested for bla (KPC), bla (VIM), bla (NDM), bla (IMP), bla (OXA-23)-like, bla (OXA-48)-like, bla (SHV)-ESBL, bla (CTX-M-1/9) group, and bla (CMY-2)-like genes using the GNR microchip assay. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) served as the reference assay for simulated samples and, selectively, for clinical samples. The bioMérieux BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel assay was used as a comparator for clinical samples. RESULTS: The GNR microchip assay correctly identified 203 (99.5%) of 204 β-lactam resistance genes in simulated samples. One sample tested false negative for a bla (SHV)-ESBL gene but true positive for a bla (KPC) gene. In clinical samples, GNR results were concordant with BCID2 for 113 (100%) of 113 genes included in both assays. Additionally, the GNR assay detected bla (CMY-2) -like (n=6), bla (OXA-23)-like (n=5), and bla (SHV)-ESBL (n=2), which are not targeted by BCID2, all confirmed by WGS. In two β-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa samples but negative by the GNR assay, WGS confirmed the absence of acquired β-lactam resistance genes, suggesting alternative resistance mechanisms. CONCLUSION: The GNR microchip assay demonstrated high concordance and broader β-lactam resistance gene coverage compared to BCID2, supporting its potential role in routine diagnostics. Further validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.202540529307
148550.9957Evaluation of Verigene Blood Culture Test Systems for Rapid Identification of Positive Blood Cultures. The performance of molecular tests using the Verigene Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Blood Culture nucleic acid tests (BC-GP and BC-GN, resp.; Naosphere, Northbrook, IL, USA) was evaluated for the identification of microorganisms detected from blood cultures. Ninety-nine blood cultures containing Gram-positive bacteria and 150 containing Gram-negative bacteria were analyzed using the BC-GP and BC-GN assays, respectively. Blood cultures were performed using the Bactec blood culture system (BD Diagnostic Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and conventional identification and antibiotic-susceptibility tests were performed using a MicroScan system (Siemens, West Sacramento, CA, USA). When a single strain of bacteria was isolated from the blood culture, Verigene assays correctly identified 97.9% (94/96) of Gram-positive bacteria and 93.8% (137/146) of Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance genes mecA and vanA were correctly detected by the BC-GP assay, while the extended-spectrum β-lactamase CTX-M and the carbapenemase OXA resistance gene were detected from 30 cases cultures by the BC-GN assay. The BC-GP and BC-GN assays showed high agreement with conventional identification and susceptibility tests. These tests are useful for rapid identification of microorganisms and the detection of clinically important resistance genes from positive Bactec blood cultures.201626904669
148660.9956Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Gram-negative blood culture nucleic acid test for rapid detection of bacteria and resistance determinants in positive blood cultures. The Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Nucleic Acid Test (BC-GN) is a microarray-based assay that enables rapid detection of 9 common Gram-negative bacteria and 6 resistance determinants directly from positive blood cultures. We compared the performance of BC-GN with currently used automated systems, testing 141 clinical blood cultures and 205 spiked blood cultures. For identification of BC-GN target organisms in clinical and spiked blood cultures, the BC-GN assay showed 98.5% (130/132) and 98.9% (182/184) concordance, respectively. Of 140 resistance genes positively detected in clinical and spiked blood cultures with the BC-GN test, 139 (99.3%) were confirmed by PCR, and the detection results were consistent with the resistance phenotypes observed. The BC-GN assay, thus, can potentially improve care for sepsis patients by enabling timely detection and targeted antimicrobial therapy.201526361710
147470.9953Simple, rapid, and cost-effective modified Carba NP test for carbapenemase detection among Gram-negative bacteria. PURPOSE: Detection of carbapenemases among Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is important for both clinicians and infection control practitioners. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends Carba NP (CNP) as confirmatory test for carbapenemase production. The reagents required for CNP test are costly and hence the test cannot be performed on a routine basis. The present study evaluates modifications of CNP test for rapid detection of carbapenemases among GNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GNB were screened for carbapenemase production using CNP, CarbAcineto NP (CANP), and modified CNP (mCNP) test. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on all the carbapenem-resistant bacteria for carbapenemase genes. The results of three phenotypic tests were compared with PCR. RESULTS: A total of 765 gram negative bacteria were screened for carbapenem resistance. Carbapenem resistance was found in 144 GNB. The metallo-β-lactamases were most common carbapenemases followed by OXA-48-like enzymes. The CANP test was most sensitive (80.6%) for carbapenemases detection. The mCNP test was 62.1% sensitive for detection of carbapenemases. The mCNP, CNP, and CANP tests were equally sensitive (95%) for detection of NDM enzymes among Enterobacteriaceae. The mCNP test had poor sensitivity for detection of OXA-48-like enzymes. CONCLUSION: The mCNP test was rapid, cost-effective, and easily adoptable on routine basis. The early detection of carbapenemases using mCNP test will help in preventing the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital settings.201728966495
148880.9953Evaluation of an automated rapid diagnostic assay for detection of Gram-negative bacteria and their drug-resistance genes in positive blood cultures. We evaluated the performance of the Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Nucleic Acid Test (BC-GN; Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL, USA), an automated multiplex assay for rapid identification of positive blood cultures caused by 9 Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and for detection of 9 genes associated with β-lactam resistance. The BC-GN assay can be performed directly from positive blood cultures with 5 minutes of hands-on and 2 hours of run time per sample. A total of 397 GNB positive blood cultures were analyzed using the BC-GN assay. Of the 397 samples, 295 were simulated samples prepared by inoculating GNB into blood culture bottles, and the remaining were clinical samples from 102 patients with positive blood cultures. Aliquots of the positive blood cultures were tested by the BC-GN assay. The results of bacterial identification between the BC-GN assay and standard laboratory methods were as follows: Acinetobacter spp. (39 isolates for the BC-GN assay/39 for the standard methods), Citrobacter spp. (7/7), Escherichia coli (87/87), Klebsiella oxytoca (13/13), and Proteus spp. (11/11); Enterobacter spp. (29/30); Klebsiella pneumoniae (62/72); Pseudomonas aeruginosa (124/125); and Serratia marcescens (18/21); respectively. From the 102 clinical samples, 104 bacterial species were identified with the BC-GN assay, whereas 110 were identified with the standard methods. The BC-GN assay also detected all β-lactam resistance genes tested (233 genes), including 54 bla(CTX-M), 119 bla(IMP), 8 bla(KPC), 16 bla(NDM), 24 bla(OXA-23), 1 bla(OXA-24/40), 1 bla(OXA-48), 4 bla(OXA-58), and 6 blaVIM. The data shows that the BC-GN assay provides rapid detection of GNB and β-lactam resistance genes in positive blood cultures and has the potential to contributing to optimal patient management by earlier detection of major antimicrobial resistance genes.201424705449
148090.9952Prospective observational pilot study of the T2Resistance panel in the T2Dx system for detection of resistance genes in bacterial bloodstream infections. Early initiation of antimicrobial therapy targeting resistant bacterial pathogens causing sepsis and bloodstream infections (BSIs) is critical for a successful outcome. The T2Resistance Panel (T2R) detects the following resistance genes within organisms that commonly cause BSIs directly from patient blood samples: bla(KPC), bla(CTXM-14/15), bla(NDM)/bla(/IMP)/bla(VIM), bla(AmpC), bla(OXA), vanA, vanB, and mecA/mecC. We conducted a prospective study in two major medical centers for the detection of circulating resistance genes by T2R in patients with BSIs. T2R reports were compared to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), phenotypic identification, and standard molecular detection assays. Among 59 enrolled patients, 25 resistance genes were identified: bla(KPC) (n = 10), bla(NDM)/bla(/IMP)/bla(VIM) (n = 5), bla(CTXM-14/15) (n = 4), bla(AmpC) (n = 2), and mecA/mecC (n = 4). Median time-to-positive-T2R in both hospitals was 4.4 hours [interquartile range (IQR): 3.65-4.97 hours] in comparison to that for positive blood cultures with final reporting of AST of 58.34 h (IQR: 45.51-111.2 hours; P < 0.0001). The sensitivity of T2R to detect the following genes in comparison to AST was 100% for bla(CTXM-14/15), bla(NDM)/bla(/)(IMP)/bla(VIM), bla(AmpC), mecA/mecC and 87.5% for bla(KPC). When monitored for the impact of significant antimicrobial changes, there were 32 events of discontinuation of unnecessary antibiotics and 17 events of escalation of antibiotics, including initiation of ceftazidime/avibactam in six patients in response to positive T2R results for bla(KPC). In summary, T2R markers were highly sensitive for the detection of drug resistance genes in patients with bacterial BSIs, when compared with standard molecular resistance detection systems and phenotypic identification assays while significantly reducing by approximately 90% the time to detection of resistance compared to standard methodology and impacting clinical decisions for antimicrobial therapy. IMPORTANCE: This is the first reported study to our knowledge to identify key bacterial resistance genes directly from the bloodstream within 3 to 5 hours in patients with bloodstream infections and sepsis. The study further demonstrated a direct effect in modifying initial empirical antibacterial therapy in response to T2R signal to treat resistant bacteria causing bloodstream infections and sepsis.202438456690
1481100.9952Molecular versus conventional assay for diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia in critically ill patients: a single center experience. PURPOSE: Lower respiratory tract infections are reported as one of top five causes of mortality and morbidity in the world. A bacterial etiology is often involved in HAP, most frequently from multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria, and fast accurate diagnosis of etiologic agent(s) of LRTI is essential for an appropriate management. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the analytical performance of Biofire Filmarray Pneumonia Plus for bacteria detection in bronchoalveolar lavage samples and the concordance of bacterial loads between BFPP and cultural gold standard methods. METHODS: A total of 111 BAL samples were obtained from 111 consecutive patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit of "Renato Dulbecco" Teaching Hospital of Catanzaro, from March 2023 to March 2024. RESULTS: Compared to conventional methods, BFPP showed a sensitivity of 99 % and a specificity of 64 %. The agreement between the two methods was assessed by calculating PPA and NPA, being 89 % and 95 %, respectively. The most common bacterial species identified at BFPP was Klebsiella pneumoniae, followed by Acinetobacter calcaceuticus-baumanii complex, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial load (CFU/ml) in relation to copy number detected by molecular analysis showed the best performance for value ≥10(6) copie/mL. About molecular mechanisms of resistance in comparison to phenotypic profiles, the highest level of performance was observed for presence of KPC genes, all isolates showing resistance to carbapenems, followed by OXA-48 like and NDM. CONCLUSION: The high concordance reported in this study between the identification of resistance genes and phenotypic indication can lead to an appropriate, fast and tailored antibiotic therapy.202540513663
1476110.9951Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel for rapid detection of respiratory bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes in sputum and endotracheal aspirate specimens. OBJECTIVES: The performance of the investigational-use-only version of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FA-Pneumo), a high-order nested multiplex PCR, was evaluated for the detection of typical respiratory bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes in sputa and endotracheal aspirate (ETA) specimens. METHODS: Thirty-one sputa and 69 ETA specimens were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of FA-Pneumo was assessed using routine microbiological methods as the reference standard. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity and specificity for organism detection using FA-Pneumo were 98.5% and 76.5%, respectively. The sensitivity for each pathogen was 100%, except for Klebsiella aerogenes, and the range of specificity was 83.3-99.0%. FA-Pneumo detected antimicrobial resistance genes in 17 out of 18 specimens (94.4%) that were resistant by antimicrobial susceptibility testing. FA-Pneumo additionally detected 25 resistance genes in 22 specimens, and sequencing for the presence of resistance genes confirmed the majority of these results (20/25, 80%). Semi-quantitative analysis of bacterial nucleic acid amounts by FA-Pneumo revealed that 88.2% of the identified bacteria (67/76) with ≥10(6) copies/ml also gave culture-positive results with significant amounts of bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: FA-Pneumo is a rapid test with high sensitivity for the detection of bacteria and antimicrobial resistance genes in sputum and ETA specimens and could aid in determining antibiotic therapy.202032179139
1490120.9951Rapid detection of Gram-negative bacteria and their drug resistance genes from positive blood cultures using an automated microarray assay. We evaluated the performance of the Verigene Gram-negative blood culture (BC-GN) assay (CE-IVD version) for identification of Gram-negative (GN) bacteria and detection of resistance genes. A total of 163 GN organisms (72 characterized strains and 91 clinical isolates from 86 patients) were tested; among the clinical isolates, 86 (94.5%) isolates were included in the BC-GN panel. For identification, the agreement was 98.6% (146/148, 95% confidence interval [CI], 92.1-100) and 70% (7/10, 95% CI, 53.5-100) for monomicrobial and polymicrobial cultures, respectively. Of the 48 resistance genes harbored by 43 characterized strains, all were correctly detected. Of the 19 clinical isolates harboring resistance genes, 1 CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli isolated in polymicrobial culture was not detected. Overall, BC-GN assay provides acceptable accuracy for rapid identification of Gram-negative bacteria and detection of resistance genes, compared with routine laboratory methods despite that it has limitations in the number of genus/species and resistance gene included in the panel and it shows lower sensitivity in polymicrobial cultures.201525591999
1483130.9950Clinical Evaluation of the iCubate iC-GPC Assay for Detection of Gram-Positive Bacteria and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures. The iC-GPC Assay (iCubate, Huntsville, AL) is a qualitative multiplex test for the detection of five of the most common Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium) responsible for bacterial bloodstream infections, performed directly from positive blood cultures. The assay also detects the presence of the mecA, vanA, and vanB resistance determinants. This study comparatively evaluated the performance of the iC-GPC Assay against the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture (BC-GP) assay (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX) for 1,134 patient blood culture specimens positive for Gram-positive cocci. The iC-GPC Assay had an overall percent agreement with the BC-GP assay of 95.5%. Discordant specimens were further analyzed by PCR and a bidirectional sequencing method. The results indicate that the iC-GPC Assay together with the iCubate system is an accurate and reliable tool for the detection of the five most common Gram-positive bacteria and their resistance markers responsible for bloodstream infections.201829899000
5037140.9950Development of an immunochromatographic assay for diagnosing the production of IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases that mediate carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas. Rapid and reliable detection of carbapenem-resistant bacteria is an important infection-control measure and a crucial aspect of antimicrobial chemotherapy. IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) is an emzyme that mediate carbapenem resistance in bacteria. Here, an immunochromatographic assay was newly developed using novel monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) recognizing IMP-type MBL. Epitope mapping of mAbs and mutational analysis of the epitope region in IMP antigen suggested that the mAbs could react to all known subtypes of IMP-type MBL. Evaluation of the assay using Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains (n=248) showed that the results of the immunochromatographic detection of the IMP-type MBLs were fully consistent with those of the PCR analysis for bla(IMP) genes, showing false positives and negatives. All positive strains were resistant to carbapenem (MIC ≥ 16 μg/ml). The assay also accurately distinguished the production of IMP-type MBLs in Pseudomonas putida, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Alcaligenes xylosoxidans. The detection limit of the assay was 5.7×10(4)cfu per test. Taken together, these data suggest that the developed assay can be used for rapid and reliable diagnosis of the production of IMP-type MBLs in Gram-negative bacteria.201121986031
1487150.9949Potential impact of a microarray-based nucleic acid assay for rapid detection of Gram-negative bacteria and resistance markers in positive blood cultures. We evaluated the Verigene Gram-negative blood culture (BC-GN) test, a microarray that detects Gram-negative bacteria and several resistance genes. A total of 102 positive blood cultures were tested, and the BC-GN test correctly identified 97.9% of the isolates within its panel. Resistance genes (CTX-M, KPC, VIM, and OXA genes) were detected in 29.8% of the isolates, with positive predictive values of 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.7% to 98.9%) in Enterobacteriaceae and 100% (95% CI, 75.9% to 100%) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and negative predictive values of 100% (95% CI, 93.9% to 100%) and 78.6% (95% CI, 51.0% to 93.6%), respectively.201424478405
2234160.9949Clinical relevance of molecular identification of microorganisms and detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in bloodstream infections of paediatric cancer patients. BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are the major cause of mortality in cancer patients. Molecular techniques are used for rapid diagnosis of BSI, allowing early therapy and improving survival. We aimed to establish whether real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) could improve early diagnosis and therapy in paediatric cancer patients, and describe the predominant pathogens of BSI and their antimicrobial susceptibility. METHODS: Blood samples were processed by the BACTEC system and microbial identification and susceptibility tests were performed by the Phoenix system. All samples were screened by multiplex 16 s rDNA qPCR. Seventeen species were evaluated using sex-specific TaqMan probes and resistance genes blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX, blaKPC, blaIMP, blaSPM, blaVIM, vanA, vanB and mecA were screened by SYBR Green reactions. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated at the time of positive blood culture and at final phenotypic identification and antimicrobial susceptibility results. RESULTS: We analyzed 69 episodes of BSI from 64 patients. Gram-positive bacteria were identified in 61 % of the samples, Gram-negative bacteria in 32 % and fungi in 7 %. There was 78.2 % of agreement between the phenotypic and molecular methods in final species identification. The mecA gene was detected in 81.4 % of Staphylococcus spp., and 91.6 % were concordant with the phenotypic method. Detection of vanA gene was 100 % concordant. The concordance for Gram-negative susceptibilities was 71.4 % for Enterobacteriaceae and 50 % for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therapy was more frequently inadequate in patients who died, and the molecular test was concordant with the phenotypic susceptibility test in 50 %. CONCLUSIONS: qPCR has potential indication for early identification of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes from BSI in paediatric cancer patients and may improve antimicrobial therapy.201627585633
1491170.9949Evaluation of an expanded antibiotic resistance gene panel on prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility results for Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures. The QIAstat-Dx BCID Panels (RUO) ("QIAstat," QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) for identification of 13 Gram-negative bacteria and 18 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene groups was evaluated. The study was conducted in two phases; in phase 1, analytical performance was evaluated against 154 challenge isolates against whole genome sequencing data. In this phase, sensitivity and specificity of organism identification calls were 153/154 (99.3%) and 1,748/1,749 (99.8%), respectively. For AMR genes, sensitivity was 434/435 (99.8%) and specificity was 2,334/2,337 (99.9%). One false-negative bla(IMP), one false-positive bla(CTX-M), and two false-positive aac-6'-lb detections were noted in this challenge set of organisms. In phase 2, 101 clinical blood culture isolates of Gram-negative rods were evaluated by the multiplexed PCR versus reference broth microdilution, for the ability of identification combined with AMR genes to predict final susceptibility results. Negative predictive values were 92.8% for ampicillin resistance (100% for Escherichia coli), 93.4% for ceftriaxone, 97.4% for ceftazidime, and 98.7% for cefepime. In constrast, negative predictive values for current standard of care (identification plus detection of bla(CTX-M)) ranged from 56.5% to 88.8%. This study demonstrated additive value of additional beta-lactamase genes for bacteria isolated from blood cultures. IMPORTANCE: Prediction of Gram-negative bacteria resistance through detection of resistance genes is complex. This study evaluated a novel, direct-from-blood or bacterial isolate multiplexed PCR for the detection of 17 resistance genes, and evaluated the prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility.202439297627
1403180.9949Evaluation of the AusDiagnostics MT CRE EU assay for the detection of carbapenemase genes and transferable colistin resistance determinants mcr-1/-2 in MDR Gram-negative bacteria. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the AusDiagnostics MT CRE EU assay for the detection of carbapenemase and acquired colistin resistance genes in Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: The assay allows the detection of blaKPC, blaOXA-48-like, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaSIM, blaGIM, blaSPM, blaFRI, blaIMI, blaGES (differentiating ESBL and carbapenemase variants), blaSME and mcr-1/-2. It was evaluated against a panel of isolates including Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. retrospectively (n = 210) and prospectively (n = 182). RESULTS: The CRE EU assay was able to detect 268/268 carbapenemase genes, with 239 belonging to the 'big five' families (KPC, OXA-48-like, NDM, VIM and IMP) and 29 carbapenemase genes of the SIM, GIM, SPM, FRI, IMI, SME and GES families. It could distinguish between ESBL and carbapenemase variants of GES. It also allowed detection of mcr-1/-2 colistin resistance genes on their own or in isolates co-producing a carbapenemase. CONCLUSIONS: The AusDiagnostics MT CRE EU assay offered wide coverage for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. It required minimal hands-on time and delivered results in less than 4 h from bacterial culture.201830189011
2236190.9949Development of a Multiplex PCR Platform for the Rapid Detection of Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance, and Candida in Human Blood Samples. The diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSIs) still relies on blood culture (BC), but low turnaround times may hinder the early initiation of an appropriate antimicrobial therapy, thus increasing the risk of infection-related death. We describe a direct and rapid multiplex PCR-based assay capable of detecting and identifying 16 bacterial and four Candida species, as well as three antibiotic-resistance determinants, in uncultured samples. Using whole-blood samples spiked with microorganisms at low densities, we found that the MicrobScan assay had a mean limit of detection of 15.1 ± 3.3 CFU of bacteria/Candida per ml of blood. When applied to positive BC samples, the assay allowed the sensitive and specific detection of BSI pathogens, including bla(KPC)-, mecA-, or vanA/vanB-positive bacteria. We evaluated the assay using prospectively collected blood samples from patients with suspected BSI. The sensitivity and specificity were 86.4 and 97.0%, respectively, among patients with positive BCs for the microorganisms targeted by the assay or patients fulfilling the criteria for infection. The mean times to positive or negative assay results were 5.3 ± 0.2 and 5.1 ± 0.1 h, respectively. Fifteen of 20 patients with MicrobScan assay-positive/BC-negative samples were receiving antimicrobial therapy. In conclusion, the MicrobScan assay is well suited to complement current diagnostic methods for BSIs.201931799215