HANDS - Word Related Documents




#
Rank
Similarity
Title + Abs.
Year
PMID
012345
147400.9869Simple, rapid, and cost-effective modified Carba NP test for carbapenemase detection among Gram-negative bacteria. PURPOSE: Detection of carbapenemases among Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is important for both clinicians and infection control practitioners. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommends Carba NP (CNP) as confirmatory test for carbapenemase production. The reagents required for CNP test are costly and hence the test cannot be performed on a routine basis. The present study evaluates modifications of CNP test for rapid detection of carbapenemases among GNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GNB were screened for carbapenemase production using CNP, CarbAcineto NP (CANP), and modified CNP (mCNP) test. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on all the carbapenem-resistant bacteria for carbapenemase genes. The results of three phenotypic tests were compared with PCR. RESULTS: A total of 765 gram negative bacteria were screened for carbapenem resistance. Carbapenem resistance was found in 144 GNB. The metallo-β-lactamases were most common carbapenemases followed by OXA-48-like enzymes. The CANP test was most sensitive (80.6%) for carbapenemases detection. The mCNP test was 62.1% sensitive for detection of carbapenemases. The mCNP, CNP, and CANP tests were equally sensitive (95%) for detection of NDM enzymes among Enterobacteriaceae. The mCNP test had poor sensitivity for detection of OXA-48-like enzymes. CONCLUSION: The mCNP test was rapid, cost-effective, and easily adoptable on routine basis. The early detection of carbapenemases using mCNP test will help in preventing the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital settings.201728966495
140310.9861Evaluation of the AusDiagnostics MT CRE EU assay for the detection of carbapenemase genes and transferable colistin resistance determinants mcr-1/-2 in MDR Gram-negative bacteria. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the AusDiagnostics MT CRE EU assay for the detection of carbapenemase and acquired colistin resistance genes in Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: The assay allows the detection of blaKPC, blaOXA-48-like, blaNDM, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaSIM, blaGIM, blaSPM, blaFRI, blaIMI, blaGES (differentiating ESBL and carbapenemase variants), blaSME and mcr-1/-2. It was evaluated against a panel of isolates including Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. retrospectively (n = 210) and prospectively (n = 182). RESULTS: The CRE EU assay was able to detect 268/268 carbapenemase genes, with 239 belonging to the 'big five' families (KPC, OXA-48-like, NDM, VIM and IMP) and 29 carbapenemase genes of the SIM, GIM, SPM, FRI, IMI, SME and GES families. It could distinguish between ESBL and carbapenemase variants of GES. It also allowed detection of mcr-1/-2 colistin resistance genes on their own or in isolates co-producing a carbapenemase. CONCLUSIONS: The AusDiagnostics MT CRE EU assay offered wide coverage for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. It required minimal hands-on time and delivered results in less than 4 h from bacterial culture.201830189011
140220.9857Detection of β-lactam resistance genes in Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures using a microchip-based molecular assay. BACKGROUND: Accurate detection of β-lactam resistance genes in bloodstream infections is critical for guiding antimicrobial therapy. This study evaluates the Alifax Gram-negative resistance (GNR) microchip assay for detecting β-lactam resistance genes directly from positive blood cultures (PBCs) for Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, including Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. METHODS: Simulated (n=146) and clinical (n=106) GN-PBC samples were tested for bla (KPC), bla (VIM), bla (NDM), bla (IMP), bla (OXA-23)-like, bla (OXA-48)-like, bla (SHV)-ESBL, bla (CTX-M-1/9) group, and bla (CMY-2)-like genes using the GNR microchip assay. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) served as the reference assay for simulated samples and, selectively, for clinical samples. The bioMérieux BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel assay was used as a comparator for clinical samples. RESULTS: The GNR microchip assay correctly identified 203 (99.5%) of 204 β-lactam resistance genes in simulated samples. One sample tested false negative for a bla (SHV)-ESBL gene but true positive for a bla (KPC) gene. In clinical samples, GNR results were concordant with BCID2 for 113 (100%) of 113 genes included in both assays. Additionally, the GNR assay detected bla (CMY-2) -like (n=6), bla (OXA-23)-like (n=5), and bla (SHV)-ESBL (n=2), which are not targeted by BCID2, all confirmed by WGS. In two β-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa samples but negative by the GNR assay, WGS confirmed the absence of acquired β-lactam resistance genes, suggesting alternative resistance mechanisms. CONCLUSION: The GNR microchip assay demonstrated high concordance and broader β-lactam resistance gene coverage compared to BCID2, supporting its potential role in routine diagnostics. Further validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.202540529307
147730.9854Multicenter Evaluation of the BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel for Detection of Bacteria, Yeasts, and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Positive Blood Culture Samples. Diagnostic tools that can rapidly identify and characterize microbes growing in blood cultures are important components of clinical microbiology practice because they help to provide timely information that can be used to optimize patient management. This publication describes the bioMérieux BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) Panel clinical study that was submitted to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Results obtained with the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel were compared to standard-of-care (SoC) results, sequencing results, PCR results, and reference laboratory antimicrobial susceptibility testing results to evaluate the accuracy of its performance. Results for 1,093 retrospectively and prospectively collected positive blood culture samples were initially enrolled, and 1,074 samples met the study criteria and were included in the final analyses. The BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 98.9% (1,712/1,731) and an overall specificity of 99.6% (33,592/33,711) for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and yeast targets which the panel is designed to detect. One hundred eighteen off-panel organisms, which the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel is not designed to detect, were identified by SoC in 10.6% (114/1,074) of samples. The BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel also demonstrated an overall positive percent agreement (PPA) of 97.9% (325/332) and an overall negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.9% (2,465/2,767) for antimicrobial resistance determinants which the panel is designed to detect. The presence or absence of resistance markers in Enterobacterales correlated closely with phenotypic susceptibility and resistance. We conclude that the BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel produced accurate results in this clinical trial.202337227281
147840.9854Multicenter Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel for Pathogen Detection in Bloodstream Infections. The FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel (BCID2; bioMérieux) is a fully automated PCR-based assay for identifying bacteria, fungi, and bacterial resistance markers in positive blood cultures (BC) in about 1 h. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the performance of the BCID2 panel for pathogen detection in positive BC. Conventional culture and BCID2 were performed in parallel at four tertiary-care hospitals. We included 152 positive BC-130 monomicrobial and 22 polymicrobial cultures-in this analysis. The BCID2 assay correctly identified 90% (88/98) of Gram-negative and 89% (70/79) of Gram-positive bacteria. Five bacterial isolates targeted by the BCID2 panel and recovered from five positive BC, including three polymicrobial cultures, were missed by the BCID2 assay. Fifteen isolates were off-panel organisms, accounting for 8% (15/182) of the isolates obtained from BC. The mean positive percent agreement between the BCID2 assay and standard culture was 97% (95% confidence interval, 95 to 99%), with agreement ranging from 67% for Candida albicans to 100% for 17 targets included in the BCID2 panel. BCID2 also identified the bla(CTX-M) gene in seven BC, including one for which no extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolate was obtained in culture. However, it failed to detect ESBL-encoding genes in three BC. Two of the 18 mecA/C genes detected by the BCID2 were not confirmed. No carbapenemase, mecA/C, or MREJ targets were detected. The median turnaround time was significantly shorter for BCID2 than for culture. The BCID2 panel may facilitate faster pathogen identification in bloodstream infections. IMPORTANCE Rapid molecular diagnosis combining the identification of pathogens and the detection of antibiotic resistance genes from positive blood cultures (BC) can improve the outcome for patients with bloodstream infections. The FilmArray BCID2 panel, an updated version of the original BCID, can detect 11 Gram-positive bacteria, 15 Gram-negative bacteria, 7 fungal pathogens, and 10 antimicrobial resistance genes directly from a positive BC. Here, we evaluated the real-life microbiological performance of the BCID2 assay in comparison to the results of standard methods used in routine practice at four tertiary care hospitals.202336519852
140550.9851The threat of carbapenem resistance in Eastern Europe in patients with decompensated cirrhosis admitted to intensive care unit. BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant organisms are an increasing concern in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis admitted to ICU were included. The isolated Enterobacteriaceae strains were tested for carbapenemase-producing genes using the Roche LightMix® Modular VIM/IMP/NDM/GES/KPC/OXA48-carbapenemase detection kit. RESULTS: 48 culture-positive infections were registered in 75 patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis. Thirty patients contracted a second infection. 46% of bacteria isolated at admission and 60% of bacteria responsible for infections identified during ICU-stay were multiresistant. ESBL+ Enterobacteriaceae were predominant at admission, while carbapenem-resistance was dominant in both Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Fermenting-Gram-Negative Bacteria responsible for infections diagnosed during hospitalisation. OXA 48 or KPC type carbapenemases were present in 30% of the analyzed Enterobacteriaceae and in 40% of the phenotypically carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains. The length of ICU stay was a risk-factor for a second infection (p=0.04). Previous carbapenem usage was associated with occurence of infections with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria during hospitalization (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is high in patients with decompensated cirrhosis admitted to ICU. Carbapenemase-producing genes in Enterobacteriaceae in our center are bla(OXA-48) and bla(KPC).202235732546
147560.9850Evaluation of the FilmArray(®) Pneumonia Plus Panel for Rapid Diagnosis of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients. The FilmArray(®) Pneumonia plus Panel (FAPP) is a new multiplex molecular test for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), which can rapidly detect 18 bacteria, 9 viruses, and 7 resistance genes. We aimed to compare the diagnosis performance of FAPP with conventional testing in 100 intensive care unit (ICU) patients who required mechanical ventilation, with clinically suspected HAP. A total of 237 samples [76 bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL(DS)) and 82 endotracheal aspirates (ETA(DS)) obtained at HAP diagnosis, and 79 ETA obtained during follow-up (ETA(TT))], were analyzed independently by routine microbiology testing and FAPP. 58 patients had paired BAL(DS) and ETA(DS). The positivity thresholds of semi-quantified bacteria were 10(3)-10(4) CFUs/mL or 10(4) copies/mL for BAL, and 10(5) CFUs/mL or copies/mL for ETA. Respiratory commensals (H. influenzae, S. aureus, E. coli, S. pneumoniae) were the most common pathogens. Discordant results for bacterial identification were observed in 33/76 (43.4%) BAL(DS) and 36/82 (43.9%) ETA(DS), and in most cases, FAPP identified one supplemental bacteria (23/33 BAL(DS) and 21/36 ETA(DS)). An absence of growth, or polybacterial cultures, explained almost equally the majority of the non-detections in culture. No linear relationship was observed between bin and CFUs/mL variables. Concordant results between paired BAL(DS) and ETA(DS) were obtained in 46/58 (79.3%) patients with FAPP. One of the 17 resistance genes detected with FAPP (mecA/C and MREJ) was not confirmed by conventional testing. Overall, FAPP enhanced the positivity rate of diagnostic testing, with increased recognition of coinfections. Implementing this strategy may allow clinicians to make more timely and informed decisions.202032983057
147370.9849Evaluation of the Unyvero i60 ITI® multiplex PCR for infected chronic leg ulcers diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: Unyvero i60 ITI multiplex PCR (mPCR) may identify a large panel of bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes. In this study, we compared results obtained by mPCR to standard bacteriology in chronic leg ulcer (CLU) infections. METHODS: A prospective study, part of the interventional-blinded randomized study "ulcerinfecte" (NCT02889926), was conducted at Saint Joseph Hospital in Paris. Fifty patients with a suspicion of infected CLU were included between February 2017 and September 2018. Conventional bacteriology and mPCR were performed simultaneously on deep skin biopsies. RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most detected pathogens. Regarding the global sensitivity, mPCR is not overcome to the standard culture. Anaerobes and slow growing bacteria were detected with a higher sensitivity rate by mPCR than standard culture. CONCLUSION: Unyvero i60 ITI multiplex PCR detected rapidly pathogenic bacteria in infected CLU especially anaerobes and slow growing bacteria and was particularly effective for patients previously treated with antibiotics.202031790779
147980.9847BioFire FilmArray BCID2 versus VITEK-2 System in Determining Microbial Etiology and Antibiotic-Resistant Genes of Pathogens Recovered from Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is among the most serious hospital acquired infections. Therefore, the rapid detection of the causative microorganism is of crucial importance to allow for the appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In the present study, we analyzed the clinical performance of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel in the identification of 33 microbial species and 10 antibiotic resistance genes in comparison to the VITEK-2 system. A total of 104 blood specimens were included. The FilmArray BCID2 results were concordant with the VITEK-2 system in 69/97 specimens (71.1%). Non-concordance was either due to the detection of more pathogens by the FilmArray BCID2 23/28 (82%) or microbial species were misidentified 5/28 (18%). Hence, in comparison to the VITEK-2 system, the FilmArray BCID2 panel showed an overall sensitivity of 75.8% (95% CI, 66-83%) and an overall specificity of 98% (95% CI, 97-98.8%) in detecting microbial species. For the resistance genes, the FilmArray BCID was able to detect the presence of blaCTX-M gene in 23 Gram-negative isolates, blaNDM and blaOXA-48- like genes in 14 and 13 isolates, respectively. The mecA and mecC genes were found in 23 Staphylococcus species, while mecA, mecC and MREJ genes were found in 4 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting resistance genes by the FilmArray BCID2 was 90% (95% CI, 81.4-95%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 99-100%), respectively. As concluded, the present study emphasizes the high sensitivity and specificity of the FilmArray BCID2 in the rapid and reliable detection of different bacteria and fungi from positive blood culture bottles, as well as the accurate detection of various antibiotic resistance markers.202236358274
148590.9847Evaluation of Verigene Blood Culture Test Systems for Rapid Identification of Positive Blood Cultures. The performance of molecular tests using the Verigene Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Blood Culture nucleic acid tests (BC-GP and BC-GN, resp.; Naosphere, Northbrook, IL, USA) was evaluated for the identification of microorganisms detected from blood cultures. Ninety-nine blood cultures containing Gram-positive bacteria and 150 containing Gram-negative bacteria were analyzed using the BC-GP and BC-GN assays, respectively. Blood cultures were performed using the Bactec blood culture system (BD Diagnostic Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and conventional identification and antibiotic-susceptibility tests were performed using a MicroScan system (Siemens, West Sacramento, CA, USA). When a single strain of bacteria was isolated from the blood culture, Verigene assays correctly identified 97.9% (94/96) of Gram-positive bacteria and 93.8% (137/146) of Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance genes mecA and vanA were correctly detected by the BC-GP assay, while the extended-spectrum β-lactamase CTX-M and the carbapenemase OXA resistance gene were detected from 30 cases cultures by the BC-GN assay. The BC-GP and BC-GN assays showed high agreement with conventional identification and susceptibility tests. These tests are useful for rapid identification of microorganisms and the detection of clinically important resistance genes from positive Bactec blood cultures.201626904669
1481100.9846Molecular versus conventional assay for diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia in critically ill patients: a single center experience. PURPOSE: Lower respiratory tract infections are reported as one of top five causes of mortality and morbidity in the world. A bacterial etiology is often involved in HAP, most frequently from multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria, and fast accurate diagnosis of etiologic agent(s) of LRTI is essential for an appropriate management. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the analytical performance of Biofire Filmarray Pneumonia Plus for bacteria detection in bronchoalveolar lavage samples and the concordance of bacterial loads between BFPP and cultural gold standard methods. METHODS: A total of 111 BAL samples were obtained from 111 consecutive patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit of "Renato Dulbecco" Teaching Hospital of Catanzaro, from March 2023 to March 2024. RESULTS: Compared to conventional methods, BFPP showed a sensitivity of 99 % and a specificity of 64 %. The agreement between the two methods was assessed by calculating PPA and NPA, being 89 % and 95 %, respectively. The most common bacterial species identified at BFPP was Klebsiella pneumoniae, followed by Acinetobacter calcaceuticus-baumanii complex, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacterial load (CFU/ml) in relation to copy number detected by molecular analysis showed the best performance for value ≥10(6) copie/mL. About molecular mechanisms of resistance in comparison to phenotypic profiles, the highest level of performance was observed for presence of KPC genes, all isolates showing resistance to carbapenems, followed by OXA-48 like and NDM. CONCLUSION: The high concordance reported in this study between the identification of resistance genes and phenotypic indication can lead to an appropriate, fast and tailored antibiotic therapy.202540513663
2215110.9845Analytical Performance of Multiplexed Screening Test for 10 Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Perianal Swab Samples. BACKGROUND: Multiantibiotic-resistant bacteria pose a threat to patients and place an economic burden on health care systems. Carbapenem-resistant bacilli and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers drive the need to screen infected and colonized patients for patient management and infection control. METHODS: We describe a multiplex microfluidic PCR test for perianal swab samples (Acuitas(®) MDRO Gene Test, OpGen) that detects the vancomycin-resistance gene vanA plus hundreds of gene subtypes from the carbapenemase and ESBL families Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), imipenemase metallo-β-lactamase (IMP), OXA-23, OXA-48, OXA-51, CTX-M-1, and CTX-M-2, regardless of the bacterial species harboring the antibiotic resistance. RESULTS: Analytical test sensitivity per perianal swab is 11-250 CFU of bacteria harboring the antibiotic resistance genes. Test throughput is 182 samples per test run (1820 antibiotic resistance gene family results). We demonstrate reproducible test performance and 100% gene specificity for 265 clinical bacterial organisms harboring a variety of antibiotic resistance genes. CONCLUSIONS: The Acuitas MDRO Gene Test is a sensitive, specific, and high-throughput test to screen colonized patients and diagnose infections for several antibiotic resistance genes directly from perianal swab samples, regardless of the bacterial species harboring the resistance genes.201626637481
1486120.9845Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Gram-negative blood culture nucleic acid test for rapid detection of bacteria and resistance determinants in positive blood cultures. The Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Nucleic Acid Test (BC-GN) is a microarray-based assay that enables rapid detection of 9 common Gram-negative bacteria and 6 resistance determinants directly from positive blood cultures. We compared the performance of BC-GN with currently used automated systems, testing 141 clinical blood cultures and 205 spiked blood cultures. For identification of BC-GN target organisms in clinical and spiked blood cultures, the BC-GN assay showed 98.5% (130/132) and 98.9% (182/184) concordance, respectively. Of 140 resistance genes positively detected in clinical and spiked blood cultures with the BC-GN test, 139 (99.3%) were confirmed by PCR, and the detection results were consistent with the resistance phenotypes observed. The BC-GN assay, thus, can potentially improve care for sepsis patients by enabling timely detection and targeted antimicrobial therapy.201526361710
1488130.9844Evaluation of an automated rapid diagnostic assay for detection of Gram-negative bacteria and their drug-resistance genes in positive blood cultures. We evaluated the performance of the Verigene Gram-Negative Blood Culture Nucleic Acid Test (BC-GN; Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL, USA), an automated multiplex assay for rapid identification of positive blood cultures caused by 9 Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and for detection of 9 genes associated with β-lactam resistance. The BC-GN assay can be performed directly from positive blood cultures with 5 minutes of hands-on and 2 hours of run time per sample. A total of 397 GNB positive blood cultures were analyzed using the BC-GN assay. Of the 397 samples, 295 were simulated samples prepared by inoculating GNB into blood culture bottles, and the remaining were clinical samples from 102 patients with positive blood cultures. Aliquots of the positive blood cultures were tested by the BC-GN assay. The results of bacterial identification between the BC-GN assay and standard laboratory methods were as follows: Acinetobacter spp. (39 isolates for the BC-GN assay/39 for the standard methods), Citrobacter spp. (7/7), Escherichia coli (87/87), Klebsiella oxytoca (13/13), and Proteus spp. (11/11); Enterobacter spp. (29/30); Klebsiella pneumoniae (62/72); Pseudomonas aeruginosa (124/125); and Serratia marcescens (18/21); respectively. From the 102 clinical samples, 104 bacterial species were identified with the BC-GN assay, whereas 110 were identified with the standard methods. The BC-GN assay also detected all β-lactam resistance genes tested (233 genes), including 54 bla(CTX-M), 119 bla(IMP), 8 bla(KPC), 16 bla(NDM), 24 bla(OXA-23), 1 bla(OXA-24/40), 1 bla(OXA-48), 4 bla(OXA-58), and 6 blaVIM. The data shows that the BC-GN assay provides rapid detection of GNB and β-lactam resistance genes in positive blood cultures and has the potential to contributing to optimal patient management by earlier detection of major antimicrobial resistance genes.201424705449
1428140.9842Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections in three intensive care units in Egypt. We aimed to identify the carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) causing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in intensive care units (ICU) in a tertiary care Egyptian hospital, to study their resistance mechanisms by phenotypic and genetic tests, and to use ERIC-PCR for assessing their relatedness. The study was conducted over 2 years in three ICUs in a tertiary care hospital in Egypt during 2015-2016. We identified 194 bloodstream infections (BSIs); 130 (67.01%) were caused by GNB, of which 57 were isolated from CRBSI patients (73.84%). Identification of isolates was performed using conventional methods and MALDI-TOF MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was done by disc diffusion following CLSI guidelines. Phenotypic detection of carbapenemases enzymes activity was by modified Hodge test and the Carba-NP method. Isolates were investigated for the most common carbapenemases encoding genes bla(KPC), bla(NDM), and bla(OXA-48) using multiplex PCR. Molecular typing of carbapenem-resistant isolates was done by ERIC-PCR followed by sequencing of common resistance genes. The overall rate of CRBSI in our study was 3.6 per 1000 central venous catheter (CVC) days. Among 57 Gram-negative CRBSI isolates, Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) was the most frequently isolated (27/57; 47.4%), of which more than 70% were resistant to Meropenem. Phenotypic tests for carbapenemases showed that 37.9% of isolates were positive by modified Hodge test and 63.8% by Carba-NP detection. Multiplex PCR assay detected the bla(NDM) in 28.6% of the isolates and bla(KPC) in 26.8%, bla(NDM) and bla(KPC) were detected together in the same isolate in 5.6%, while bla(OXA-48)-like were not detected. ERIC-PCR detected limited genetic relatedness between K. pneumoniae isolates. Elevated resistance rates were observed to all antibiotics including carbapenems among K. pneumoniae isolates causing CRBSI. ERIC-PCR showed that the resistant isolates were mainly polyclonal. Our results call for reinforcement of antimicrobial stewardship and measures to prevent CRBSI.201829936619
2223150.9842Evaluation of a new real-time PCR assay (Check-Direct CPE) for rapid detection of KPC, OXA-48, VIM, and NDM carbapenemases using spiked rectal swabs. To prevent the spread of carbapenemase-producing bacteria, a fast and accurate detection of patients carrying these bacteria is extremely important. The Check-Direct CPE assay (Check-Points, Wageningen, The Netherlands) is a new multiplex real-time PCR assay, which has been developed to detect and differentiate between the most prevalent carbapenemase genes encountered in Enterobacteriaceae (blaKPC, blaOXA-48, blaVIM, and blaNDM) directly from rectal swabs. Evaluation of this assay using 83 non-duplicate isolates demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity and the correct identification of the carbapenemase gene(s) present in all carbapenemase-producing isolates. Moreover, the limit of detection (LoD) of the real-time PCR assay in spiked rectal swabs was determined and showed comparable LoDs with the ChromID CARBA agar. With an excellent performance on clinical isolates and spiked rectal swabs, this assay appeared to be an accurate and rapid method to detect blaKPC, blaOXA-48, blaVIM, and blaNDM genes directly from a rectal screening swab.201324135412
1430160.9842Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from blood cultures and rapid detection of beta-lactamase-encoding genes by multiplex PCR assay. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from blood cultures in a tertiary-care hospital and the multiplex PCR assay's ability to detect resistance genes. METHODS: A total of 388 GNB isolates obtained from hospitalized patients between November 2019 and November 2021 were included in the study. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by VITEK 2 system and broth microdilution method. Beta-lactamase-encoding genes were detected by multiplex PCR assays, BioFire-Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel (bioMérieux, France). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) were detected phenotypically with VITEK AST-GN71 card (bioMérieux, France). The isolates of GNB were classified into multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant categories, and their prevalence and distribution in different wards, including coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) intensive care units (ICU), were calculated. RESULTS: Results revealed that all isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were multidrug-resistant as well as 91.6% of Enterobacter cloacae, 80.6% of Proteus mirabilis, and 76.1% of Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively. In fermentative bacteria, bla(OXA-48-like) (58.1%), bla(NDM) (16.1%), bla(KPC) (9.7%) and bla(VIM) (6.5%) genes were detected. More than half of Enterobacter cloacae (58.3%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (53.7%) produced ESBLs. Among non-fermenters, the bla(NDM) gene was carried by 55% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 19.5% of Acinetobacter baumannii. In the COVID-19 ICU, Acinetobacter baumannii was the most common isolate (86.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed high proportions of multidrug-resistant blood isolates and various underlying resistance genes in Gram-negative strains. The BCID2 panel seems to be helpful for the detection of the most prevalent resistance genes of fermentative bacteria.202238021186
2096170.9841Investigation of isepamicin in vitro efficiency in Gram negative bacteria efficacy of isepamicin. CONTEXT: Isepamicin is a new semisynthetic aminoglycoside derived from gentamicin B and it is effective against Gram negative bacteria. Antibiotic resistance is an emerging problem and new options need for the treatment of infections caused by Gram negative bacteria. AIMS: In this study we aimed to investigate the in vitro efficiency in carbapenem susceptible and nonsusceptible Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A total of 214 isolates of Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacterales n = 129 and P. aeruginosa n = 85). Identification of the bacteria was tested in Vitek MS (Biomeriux, France). Susceptibility of isepamicin, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin and netilmicin was determined by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. The breakpoints for susceptibility to isepamicin, amikacin, gentamicin, streptomycin, tobramycin and netilmicin were evaluated according to the Comité de l'Antibiogramme dela Société Française de Microbiologie (CA-SFM) and EUCAST, respectively. Aminoglycoside modifying enzyme (AME) genes were investigated by multiplex PCR method. RESULTS: Isepamicin susceptibility was determined as 92.3% for Enterobacterales and 67% for P. aeruginosa and 94.4% for carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales. The most common AME gene was aac (6')-Ib in both Enterobacterales (76%) and P. aeruginosa (14.1%). Seven of the isepamicin intermediate or resistant isolates were positive aac (6')-Ib in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, isepamicin showed good efficiency against both susceptible and carbapenem nonsusceptible Enterobacterales. But amikacin was prior to isepamicin P. aeruginosa isolates. Isepamicin could be a therapeutic option for the infections caused by Enterobacterales.202133610258
1426180.9841Phenotypic and genotypic detection of carbapenemase production among gram negative bacteria isolated from hospital acquired infections. OBJECTIVES: To identify the carbapenemase producing Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) by phenotypic methods and to confirm the presence of resistant genes using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS: This was a prospective study carried out at the Department of Microbiology, Sri Venkata Sai Medical College and Hospital, Mahabubnagar, India, from March 2018-2021. All samples were screened for carbapenem resistance by disc diffusion method and the VITEK(®)2 compact system (bioMérieux, France). Detection of carbapenemase was carried out using RAPIDEC(®)CARBA NP test (Biomeriux Private Limited, South Delhi, India), screening for metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) was carried out by double disk synergy test (DDST), and genotypic characterization by real-time PCR. RESULTS: Among the 1093 Gram-negative bacilli identified, 220 (17.0%) were resistant to carbapenems by both tested methods. Carbapenemase detection using the RAPIDEC(®)CARBA NP test indicated that 207 (94.0%) were carbapenemase producers, of which 189 (91.2%) were MBL producers. The most common carbapenemase genes identified were New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM; 47.3%), followed by the co-existence of genes in combination of NDM, with Verona integron-mediated metallo-β-lactamase (VIM; 39.6%), VIM and oxacillin hydrolyzing enzymes-48 (OXA-48; 4.3%), and OXA-48 (1.4%).No gene of active on imipenem, Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase, VIM, or OXA-48 alone was detected. CONCLUSION: This study suggests routine carbapenem resistance testing among multi-drug resistant-GNBs, as most of these infections occur in hospitals. In addition, there is a possibility that these highly antibiotic-resistant genes could spread to other bacteria resulting in further dissemination.202235256490
1425190.9840Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance of Complicated Intraabdominal Infection Pathogens in Two Tertiary Hospitals in Egypt. Background: Management of complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs) requires containment of the source and appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy. Identifying the local data is important to guide the empirical selection of antimicrobial therapy. In this study, we aimed to describe the pathogen distribution and antimicrobial resistance of cIAI. Methods: In two major tertiary care hospitals in Egypt, we enrolled patients who met the case definition of cIAI from October 2022 to September 2023. Blood cultures were performed using the BACTAlert system (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). A culture of aspirated fluid, resected material, or debridement of the infection site was performed. Identification of pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were conducted by the VITEK-2 system (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Gram-negative resistance genes were identified by PCR and confirmed by whole bacterial genome sequencing using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit and sequencing with the MiSeq Reagent Kit 600 v3 (Illumina, USA) on the Illumina MiSeq. Results: We enrolled 423 patients, 275 (65.01%) males. The median age was 61.35 (range 25-72 years). We studied 452 recovered bacterial isolates. Gram-negative bacteria were the vast majority, dominated by E. coli, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Proteus mirabilis (33.6%, 30.5%, 13.7%, 13%, and 5.4%, respectively). High rates of resistance were detected to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. No resistance was detected to colistin. Resistance to amikacin and tigecycline was low among all isolates. Resistance to meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam was moderate. ESBL genes were common in E. coli and K. pneumoniae. CTX-M15 gene was the most frequent. Among Enterobacterales, bla(OXA-48) and bla(NDM) were the most prevalent carbapenemase genes. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates harbored a wide variety of carbapenemase genes (OXA, NDM, VIM, SIM, GIM, SPM, IMP, AIM), dominated by metallo-beta-lactamases. In 20.6% of isolates, we identified two or more resistance genes. Conclusion: High resistance rates were detected to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Amikacin and tigecyclines were the most active antimicrobials. Our data call for urgent implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs and reinforcement of infection control.202439172656